Barry had a link to an article about Goldman Sachs' ten best trades for 2008 and most of them seemed to focus on currencies which can't be accessed very well through brokerage accounts.
There are obviously a few Rydex ETFs and even fewer ETNs from Barclays but they focus on just the biggies and after talking to one of the Rydex guys last year they have no plans to expand the product line, not even the Singapore dollar (SGD) is under consideration. Maybe something has changed?
I believe foreign diversification in currencies is just as important as in equities and fixed income. Perhaps the future of this asset class' accessibility will simply be discount brokerage firms allowing the purchase of foreign currency in brokerage accounts (does this already exist and I don't know about it?).
Some will say its too speculative and that brokerage firms should not offer this. Holding foreign currency ( as opposed to futures contracts) with no leverage is far less risky than somethings brokerage firms have allowed for years. Ever known anyone to blow themselves up owning a huge position, on margin, of a biotech stock that had bad FDA news? The result is negative equity, that means you need to bring money in just to get back to zero. Believe me this has happened many times in the past. This is why a lot of firms were fiddling with margin requirements at the start of the decade.
Ever known anyone to blow themselves up with naked puts? A put sold with a strike of 100 only requires $2500 margin (rule of thumb number). So you'd have to buy $10,000 worth of stock if assigned on one put. Obviously a brokerage firm would let you sell four puts with only $10,000 (subject to minimum account size). So if this blows up very badly the put seller might have to pay $40,000 for $15,000 worth of stock. This happened routinely at the start of the decade.
Buying $10,000 worth of Moldovan leus (MDL), or something a little less off the wall, in a cash account could make for a bumpy ride but won't make for negative equity. And for the this-is-too-dangerous crowd brokerages could implement a suitability screen like they do with options.
For now ETFs, limitations notwithstanding, are the easiest way to add currency exposure--at Schwab anyway. If something better comes along I would have no qualms about bailing on the ETFs. This brings me to a good point to conclude with which is that the product is less important than getting the access you want.





18 comments:
I wonder if there is a list of ultrashort etf's which can neutralizes your international volatility quickly and efficiently. Here is a start: EFU(-2xEFA), EEV(-2xEEM),FXP(-2xFXI)
Excellent post.
I casually mentioned a few days ago that an idea for a future blog address how to access investments not readily available to US individuals.
I access the few investmeht products I really like but cannot purchase here through a Swiss Bank. Pricey, but it does the job.
Having a safe haven outside the US
to accomplish investment objectives may be prudent.
does an account in Iceland count, lol?
I have mixed feelings about foreign accounts in this context as a safe haven.
I would like to think such a thing would never be necessary but I concede it is not the worst idea in the world either.
I believe you can purchase foreign CD through www.everbank.com!
CA
i know about Everbank. The idea of locking into a CD I don't like. They also allow you to hold currency not in CD but i don't think they pay much interest in that case.
I believe that Interactive Brokers allow for some amount of foreign currency trading within its brokerage account. The spread is wider than professional trading accounts, but then we are not talking about massive leveraged currency trading here.
Roger,
What about cef's that manage foreign currency debt...am I naive to think that they access and a higher fee is worth the management expertise?...am I targeting a product that does not match what you are suggesting?
jasper
Jasper those fit the bill, sort of. Without question the managemnt can be good and worth it.
I have done write ups on TSCM on a couple of them and I find that they lean heavily in one direction. So if you buy a fund that has done well you are in part betting that they will continue to be right.
As this would be a small portion of a portfolio the idea of being able to select two or three currencies with different attributes seems compelling.
Very disappointing that Rydex has no expansion plans re currency ETFs although I agree that I wouldn't care if something else like brokerage access filled the gap.
Roger,
Do you see this asset class as having the potential to deliver double digit gains on par with equities...such as rotation of sector leadership...or is this more intended as a minor tweak to smoothe the ride?
When you say that some of the cef's lean heavily in one direction...are you characterizing all as a whole or each manager is likely to have their own overweighting? If the latter, then a small group would be a reasonable approach? Wouldn't complain if you linked the TCSM post...or, I can google. Thanks.
one was JGT. They owned a lot of high yielding deficit countries so the yield of the fund would be higher.
i think most people looking in the CEF space want yield. if you manage a product that could meet demand in this way what would you do? The consequence for this overweighting will not matter that often but when it does, whoa Nestor.
I don't expect double digit returns. That has kind of been the case as a function of luck when I had FXS. I bought FXE very recently at 141.07 which is up a fair bit in a short time. Fewer clients have owned FXA since july 06 so that has turned out double digit too.
I would happy if it did nothing but pay interest (this is thought of as cash) but if the dollar keeps dropping it should act as protection.
Off topic a bit, but I would like your thoughts on the portfolios of two almost new ETFs lauched recently that capture interntional dividends: IDV and FGD.
As per a previous post today, I looked into Everbank products a while ago and came away unimpressed. Maybe my expectations were too high.
Etrade offers holding foreign currencies, as well as also investing ini foreign stock on foreign exhanges (not ADRs)
However, they could blow up also.
Steve
T, i have not as yet rolled up the sleeves on either one.
I will try to take a look this week.
thanks
maybe we should wait for the second capital infusion from Citadel?
I am a littled puzzled by the foreign exchange remarks. If you want to trade forex and have a reasonably sized potfolio, just about any major bank should be able to offer you a professional platform and decent conditions to do it. Even private investors can open an account with e.g. Oanda
http://www.oanda.com/
as easily as with any stock broker. If you don't want to "lock" money into a forex-only broker (though transfers are easy) use a cross-product platform like Saxo:
http://www.saxobank.com/
If you don't want to deal with them directly because they are "foreign" (Denmark, ooh, scary!) they partner with banks all over the place, e.g. Citi, and you can sign up through one of those instead.
Sorry if the context was not clear, I mean in a brokerage account, everything under one roof so to speak, if possible.
Saxo would not be scary, I have money at Kaupthing in Iceland, just own an ETF and a money market.
If i Ran money, I would put 90% in ETFC right now and the rest in cash.
Post a Comment