I've been listening to Bruce Springsteen since he looked like that and while in all those years (more than 30) I have never burned out on his music it has only taken a couple of days for me to burn out on all the bailout coverage and analysis.The importance and many questions notwithstanding it is wearying. OK, rant over.
One little nugget you may have heard yesterday after the close; a guest on CNBC said the bailout plan is too small. He said that Wamu alone has $100 billion in bad debt making $700 billion, in his estimation, too small.
Marc Faber was on CNBC Asia for 90 minutes last night saying something very similar.
I continue to marvel at how unimportant everything else is in light of the bailout story.
Yesterday I spent a little time trying to wrap my hands around an OEF from Index IQ which tries to blend together six different hedge funds strategies to deliver an absolute return.
I really had some trouble understanding this and still don't fully get it. The fund owns 13 ETFs. It replicates and blends the six hedge fund strategies using those 13 ETF. I could not glean how it weights the six strategies or how 13 ETFs can actually replicate even one hedge fund.
I will say that based on the holdings as of June 30 the fund has probably done very well. It was heavy in fixed income ETFs, close to flat commodities and short equities. I say probably done well because I don't know, the fund does not have a ticker symbol yet and is only available through eTrade and perhaps one other brokerage (not Schwab).
I don't think I ever said anything about the ETF conference I just attended. The mood was not particularly heavy in light of what the stock market is doing. I'm not sure whether there is a contrarian nugget there or not. The panelists ranged from rocket scientists to guys with almost nothing to say, I'd like to think I was somewhere in the middle (nervous chuckle).
One thing I have noticed at these conferences is the swag giveaways in the exhibition room is getting less and less. The first one of these I went to I could barely carry it all. On this go around there was almost nothing. Is this a barometer of economic health of the industry? I don't know the answer but I do wonder.
My presentation was about portfolio construction. What I tried to do was go sector by sector and get as close as I could to the portfolio that I use for clients (which is mostly individual stocks). This is getting easier and easier to do as more products come out.
The advantage to this would be you avoid single stock risk but still create some very specific effects. The down side is that the dividend yield is likely to be lower and I tend to believe that you can build a portfolio of 40 stocks (or whatever your number might be), have a couple that go up a lot and have none that go to zero. If you can do that, and get the sector decisions mostly right, you have a good chance of adding some outperformance.
That product innovation is making sophisticated portfolio construction more accessible is a great thing for anyone able to spend the time.
If you look at what is in registration but not yet listed (IndexUniverse is the best resource for this) there are all sorts of potentially interesting things. Two that seem to be missing are the CBOE Put Write Index and something tied to the Baltic Dry Index.
I hope that WisdomTree follows through on their currency filings. I think it would open the door to a lot possibilities; either casting your lot with one or two currencies based on their fundamentals or constructing a combo of currencies with different characteristics that collectively might not move much in price but could generate quite a bit of yield (this would be rather research intensive).
One thing that I have no interest in is 130/30.





10 comments:
Just gotta wonder how difficult it must be for Paulson to develop a well thought out plan given the current whack-a-mole crisis management mode combined with a little sleep deprivation. I'm sure the atmosphere is that of an admiral's warroom during an epic battle.
Like him or not, he's earning his pay.
Anon in C.G.
Roger,
Big fan of ETFs and the blog as you know. Your thoughts about ETFs and fees? As you mention, your current client portfolios are "close to the metal" but have single stock risk. I've noticed that the more specialized the ETF, the higher likelihood of higher fees (~1% or more). Does the fee of the ETF offset transaction costs to the point where it's not an issue in your holdings?
If this has been discussed before, please feel free to give me an RTFM link.
Thanks.
Roger. Jumping on Bill B's comment, I have noticed that closed-end funds have higher management fees than ETF's and that many use leverage. Does the use of leverage, which in theory enhances value and returns, justify the higher management fees? Thanks, JCarr
Oh there must be a link somewhere but w/b difficult to find.
The way I view this issue is that fees are not the first priority. Not sure where it ranks in terms of priority but behavior of the portfolio is more important to me than the fees.
for someone who is confident in their ability to be correct more often than not with sector decisions then i think the extra value there would FAR outweigh the fee issue.
Jcarr i think the higher fee is for the active management of the CEF
Roger,
My take on Bill B's comments were how do you evaluate the cost/benefit of owning single stock exposure versus sector ETF's? For example, you recently sold BAC which may cause a taxable event for your clients, however, if financial exposure was captured via an ETF one would not have to be as concerned with taxes. Please provide further insight into the single stock versus ETF sector exposure when taxes are taken into consideration?
i didn't see anything about taxes in the BillB's question but whatever I buy what I think is the best way to capture each part of the market that I want to own from my top down opinion of what is going on.
some picks turn out to be close to the best way to go and some do not. BAC probably turned out to be a push although the yield has been higher than an ETF so maybe then the common gets the nod but i am not sure.
but that is the focus, the best way to capture each segment. taxes are not more importnat than that.
the process of stock versus etf focuses on things like whether it makes sense to take single stock risk based on the state of the sector and where we are in the stock market cycle and or the economic cycle.
also for some themes there is no ETF, like norway, or the ETF is built in such a way that it does not capture what I am after, like EWZ being heavy in financials.
Roger
Is there a video or a transcript of the presentation you gave?
Thanx
Official transcript:
Narf ack gerflack.
I'll be available for questions.
Actually none of the above that I am aware of, sorry.
Here's why you never listen to the 'experts' from Washington DC on the economy:
http://tinyurl.com/49g8x4
Post a Comment