
First up I wanted to expand on one of my Tweets from yesterday.
Barrons says "piling into financials" could be dangerous. Clearly a lottery ticket bounce has come for some, but real leadershp is a bad bet
Those aren't typos, with only 140 characters available per Tweet I'm learning that sometimes you need to economize on certain letters.
Anywho one thing that I always keep an eye on is sector weightings within the S&P 500. When a sector gets too big I view that as a warning sign. I am aware of two times where a sector grew to about 30%; one was energy in the early 1980s and the other was tech at the start of this decade. Energy stocks were in a bubble of sorts and contracted to mid single-digit percentages of the S&P 500 and stayed there until a few years ago before getting up to about 17% when crude went to $147 last summer.
Financials grew to a little over 20% at their peak from a norm of the mid teens. A 20% weight is a flashing light as opposed to a red flag if that makes sense but the 20% weight was what first got me to underweight financials quite a few years ago. Here is a blog post from 2004 which is the oldest one I can find with this detail. That was before the yield curve actually inverted but a sector that takes up more room than what is normal is something to follow closely and in this case where the sector in question was greater than 20% I went underweight.
Almost 30 years after the energy bubble and the sector only got back to about half of its peak weight, and even then only for a short time. Tech is a little over half its peak weight nine years later (and I would submit that is attributable to the implosion in the financial sector). Financials are now 12% of the index down from a peak of what I specifically recall as being 22% and my hunch is that once that lottery ticket bounce exhausts it will be a long time before the sector does something meaningful--individual stock could be a different story and I think certain foreign banks will come back because they avoided the types of behaviors that brought down US financials.
The picture above is from a local highway project taken Friday night and as many vehicles as there are in the picture it doesn't even capture the entire fleet. You may or may not have a big project happening near you but I think the picture serves as a good reminder. Whatever the final tallies will be for the size of the GDP contraction, the numbers for unemployment, output or various ISM numbers things are still happening. They are happening a little slower and less frequently right now but in the picture is a lot of Caterpillar vehicles (CAT is a client holding). They had to be bought at some point and we know there will be other projects all over the country and many other places in the world and some of them will need new vehicles.
Things have slowed down and may slow further but economic activity is not disappearing altogether. It can be easy to forget this when a stock goes down a lot but most companies are still selling things to their customers.
The second picture is an espresso maker that was featured in Barron's for $2400. The $2400 does not include the expense of going to Germany for two weeks to learn how to use it. A little humor attempt.If you haven't done so already, please check me out on Twitter at http://twitter.com/randomroger





9 comments:
Roger,
I believe the expresso machine is from Switzerland. Hard to believe but they are worth the money. We've had ours about 8 years and produced over 16,000 cups of the most delicious brew possible. Luxury is in the eye of the beholder. For some a cup of joe is a cup of joe. I have 200,000 miles on my Toyota because for some a ride in a car is a ride in a car. Happy Easter.
We have a Starbucks machine that we bought in 2000 two in the morning and one in the afternoon most days. the steam wand has been cracked for a while. sometimes it leaks and sometimes not. When it does leak my wife will make a comment about needing a new machine and then the wand stops leaking for a while:)
Thanks for the post, Roger. Little by little I've been learning from you over the last 20 months. Sector weightings always produced blank stares in me before.
I heard that consumer consumption fell so rapidly that it was under the natural replacement values, and so had to bounce somewhat. What should appear soon is whether 'stuff' is being replaced at the end of its lifespan or just being done without. I'm hoping for the former, and an improving jobs situation should help that.
"owning one (MLP) can be a good idea but this is a segment where people go WAY too heavy"
How much is too heavy? I regard pipelines as my utility sector: long-term assets with reliable yields--not a play on energy.
Currently 8+% of my portfolio (this will probably go up as price pop in response to the Barron's plug) and about 10% of my income yield.
ultimately only you know the answer but how would you perceive the impact of the group getting crushed for some unforeseen reason and the dividends then being cut by a lot?
you either think you are too vulnerable to something that should not happen or you are not too vulnerable. I have read in the comments over the years a real attachement to these things, almost a denial that anything bad could happen. Not saying that pertains to you but if something that should never happen does happen do you think you have too much?
Thanks Roger for today's post. What is interesting to me is the S%P sector percentage. Where would be a place to get the sector percentage for the S&P500?
As far the espresso machine, we have a Gaggia Baby. In Naples they say the variants of a good espresso are the weather, the coffee grind, the water and the machine. The espresso machine must have a good compressor like the gaggia's. It must drip very slowly so that you obtain a brownish creamy top. Napolitani(people from Naples) say the best water is the one from Naples. In Milan we buy robusta coffee wich cost 8 Euro per kilo and it is grinded for BAR at number 11. I do not think a $2400 will get you a better espresso, perhaps a worse one. I was reading the comments in amazon of a person that purchased a Gaggia and was saying that he was looking for a repair shop because when he pushes the button the espresso was dripping very slowly. The machine is made to drip slowly so that you get a very creamy coffee. But Roger in everything there is knowledge to be acquired before a person ventures on his own even in making an espresso. And currently am learning quite a bit about investment, it is lot's of fun. One person and place that must say thanks is you, your blog and the rest of the participants.
Jeff from Milan, Italy
thanks Jeff, the easiest place to get the sector info is on the iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV) page at the iShares site
https://news.fidelity.com/news/news.jhtml?cat=Markets.Int&articleid=200904090958STREETCMREALTIME_10482856&IMG=N
Roger, could you comment on this article?
Thanks,
Sam
He has written quite a few similar articles. I wrote a couple of theoretical posts for TSCM about a paired trade involving SKF. The concept worked for a while then the market imploded and many of the sector funds got squirrely. As far as what I actually did for clients, I used SDS and while it did not track exactly over longer periods of time on days where the market tanked SDS went up a lot which served to reduce the vol of the portfolio.
Eric is obviously factually correct but I am not sure that the long term viability is as bad as he thinks. in the last 18 months everything has malfunctioned so why should these be different. If the market's vol goes back down I imagine these would look a little better.
Post a Comment