Friday, August 10, 2012
Follow Up to Platinum as Proxy for the Euro
A few weeks ago I posted a recap from the Delivering Alpha Conference, as posted elsewhere, and talked about a couple of the ideas in a little more detail. One of the ideas not discussed for lack of detail provided elsewhere was shorting platinum as a proxy for shorting the euro.
This idea resurfaced yesterday in this article at the Wall Street Journal. The trade comes from Kathleen Kelly of Queen Anne's Gate Capital Management. The concept is easy to understand. Platinum is used to manage emissions from diesel vehicles and Europe has a lot of diesel vehicles. The rough economic times in Europe means fewer new cars are being purchased which means less demand for platinum so platinum drops in price.
The WSJ article notes that this has worked because platinum has indeed gone down in price. From the article though it is not clear whether the trade has been correct for the right reason or for the wrong reason. For example if 2% of platinum consumption is used in new cars sold in Europe then it becomes more difficult to connect the dots than if 15% of platinum consumption is used here and the article doesn't say.
Supporting the idea that this has actually been a well thought out and well executed trade is the history of the correlation between the euro as measured by FXE and platinum as measured by PPLT. At times, since the launch of PPLT, the correlation has been negative and at other times the correlation has been pretty tight as has been the case for much of 2012.
In picking platinum as a proxy for the euro, Kelly had to first draw a bearish conclusion on the euro and then correctly determine that the correlation would between platinum and the euro would tighten. It appears to me that the reason to use platinum as a proxy in this case for the euro was to get a sort of leverage in the trade.
Both the euro and platinum peaked in late February. Since that peak FXE is down 7.2% and PPLT is down 18.3% so there was more bang for the buck using platinum. There is no mention as to whether Kelly used actual leverage in putting on the short platinum position but the more bang for the buck concept is something we've discussed here in the context of using SDS as a hedge while at other times increasing the beta of the portfolio as a means of increasing equity market exposure.
This specific type of trade is probably not one I would do because of the extra layer of the manner in which the correlation between the two can change meaningfully. This trade is like a two level proxy which becomes more difficult to explains to clients versus a one level proxy.
Zooming out a little we consider many of our holdings to be proxies for various effect we try to include in the portfolio like Statoil (STO) which is by far the largest company in Norway and is a proxy for Norway in our opinion and has been in client portfolios for many years, subject to the occasional rebalancing trade.
The picture is the Homestake Mining Hydro Electric Plan No 2 located in Spearfish Canyon.
This idea resurfaced yesterday in this article at the Wall Street Journal. The trade comes from Kathleen Kelly of Queen Anne's Gate Capital Management. The concept is easy to understand. Platinum is used to manage emissions from diesel vehicles and Europe has a lot of diesel vehicles. The rough economic times in Europe means fewer new cars are being purchased which means less demand for platinum so platinum drops in price.
The WSJ article notes that this has worked because platinum has indeed gone down in price. From the article though it is not clear whether the trade has been correct for the right reason or for the wrong reason. For example if 2% of platinum consumption is used in new cars sold in Europe then it becomes more difficult to connect the dots than if 15% of platinum consumption is used here and the article doesn't say.
Supporting the idea that this has actually been a well thought out and well executed trade is the history of the correlation between the euro as measured by FXE and platinum as measured by PPLT. At times, since the launch of PPLT, the correlation has been negative and at other times the correlation has been pretty tight as has been the case for much of 2012.
In picking platinum as a proxy for the euro, Kelly had to first draw a bearish conclusion on the euro and then correctly determine that the correlation would between platinum and the euro would tighten. It appears to me that the reason to use platinum as a proxy in this case for the euro was to get a sort of leverage in the trade.
Both the euro and platinum peaked in late February. Since that peak FXE is down 7.2% and PPLT is down 18.3% so there was more bang for the buck using platinum. There is no mention as to whether Kelly used actual leverage in putting on the short platinum position but the more bang for the buck concept is something we've discussed here in the context of using SDS as a hedge while at other times increasing the beta of the portfolio as a means of increasing equity market exposure.
This specific type of trade is probably not one I would do because of the extra layer of the manner in which the correlation between the two can change meaningfully. This trade is like a two level proxy which becomes more difficult to explains to clients versus a one level proxy.
Zooming out a little we consider many of our holdings to be proxies for various effect we try to include in the portfolio like Statoil (STO) which is by far the largest company in Norway and is a proxy for Norway in our opinion and has been in client portfolios for many years, subject to the occasional rebalancing trade.
The picture is the Homestake Mining Hydro Electric Plan No 2 located in Spearfish Canyon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






5 comments:
It's an interesting idea. A quick search yielded this 152 page tome on PGMs: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2004/1224/2004-1224.pdf, with everything you might possibly want to know. I did a quick read and it looks to me that shorting platinum is as much shorting China or Japan as it is Europe.
However, if you compare EUO to PPLT, there is an amazing inverse correlation, but EUO has been the better choice over the past year.
Rich
This is a cognitive trap...seeing patterns where none exist.
OK I ran the numbers i.e. did a cross correlation of the two securities for one year and three years of daily closes. There is a slight negative correlation between the two, which means that the theory is not correct.
In my opinion, platinum dropped like all commodities did, and the diesel use in europe had nothing to do with it. So the wonk got lucky.
investing should not be this hard.
Platinum as a proxy for the Euro?
I'm sorry, but I'm sitting here laughing so hard that I'm almost shooting Dr. Pepper out my nose.
Bill66
Post a Comment